Document Type

Article

Publication Date

10-2006

Abstract

Three experiments show that the motivational effects of regulatory fit (consistency between regulatory state and strategic means) are context-dependent. With no explicit decision rule about when to stop (Experiment 1) or an explicit enjoyment stop rule (Experiments 2 and 3), participants exerted more effort on tasks when experiencing regulatory fit than when experiencing regulatory nonfit. With an explicit sufficiency stop rule (Experiments 2 and 3), participants exerted less effort when experiencing regulatory fit than when experiencing regulatory nonfit. The interactive effect of regulatory fit and stop rules can be explained by misattribution of rightness feelings from regulatory fit: the effect was eliminated by drawing participants’ attention to an earlier event as a source of rightness feelings (Experiments 1 and 3).

Publication Name

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volume Number

91

First Page

601

Last Page

611

Issue Number

4

DOI

10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.601

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.